![]() |
![]() |
|
More Accurate, Quantitative Method Reported for Linking Biomarker Expression to Patient Outcomes
—Study Results May Send Current Practice of Immunohistochemistry “Back to the Drawing Board”— New Haven, Conn., December 21, 2005— According to a study published today in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, there are inherent limitations in the current pathology methodology used in protein biomarker studies. Use of Automated Quantitative Analysis (AQUA®) technology from HistoRx, Inc. elucidated that the concentration of antibodies used as tags to identify biomarkers of interest in patient tissue dramatically affects the apparent relationship between the biomarker’s expression and clinical outcome. These findings are particularly relevant to translational medicine, as the relationship between protein expression and disease gains an increasing role in the way physicians treat patients and individualize therapeutic regimes. “Variations in expression levels and patient response or outcome have been previously highlighted in the literature, but unfortunately researchers have had no effective method to standardize their biomarker detection techniques,” said David L. Rimm, M.D., Ph.D., associate professor of pathology at Yale University School of Medicine, and co-author of the study. “We found that the antibody concentration chosen by pathologists can dramatically affect and even reverse the apparent relationships between biomarker expression levels and patient outcomes. This study challenges the way pathologists have viewed immunohistochemistry, and sheds light on the fact that studies of biomarker expression are in need of further development and analysis.” By providing an increased level of quantization, standardization, and spatial information not afforded by other technologies, HistoRx’s AQUA technology can improve current pathology methods and practices. The system measures and localizes disease-specific variations in protein expression within tissue automatically, with a high level of precision. The multi-tissue proteomic analysis system combines fluorescence-based imaging with automated microscopy and high-throughput tissue microarray technologies. The study was published in the December 21st issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute accompanied by an editorial by Donald Earl Henson, M.D., of the George Washington University Cancer Institute, entitled “Back to the Drawing Board on Immunohistochemistry and Predictive Factors.” In the editorial, Dr. Henson noted that “biomarkers may have the power to provide diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic information for personalized medicine. However, immunohistochemistry, a popular technique for evaluating biomarker expression, may contain procedural flaws that jeopardize its promise. Previous reports have described changes in the relation between protein expression, detection technique, and outcome.” In follow up to the editorial, Dennis C. Sgroi, M.D., a leading breast cancer pathologist noted, “AQUA has proven to be a very effective tool in determining the flaws and inconsistencies associated with immunohistochemistry. These findings warrant review by pathologists in questioning the validity of current practices and before the data from predictive biomarker studies is formally integrated into practice and patient treatment. The ability of AQUA to accurately measure protein expression and localization in diseased tissue with such high precision may enable pathologists to overcome many of the challenges associated with linking biomarker expression and patient outcomes we’ve seen in the literature to date.” Dr. Sgroi is the director of Breast Pathology at the Massachusetts General Hospital and an associate professor of Pathology at the Harvard Medical School. The study was conducted by researchers at the Department of Pathology at Yale University School of Medicine to decipher inconsistencies in traditional immunohistochemistry, a technique for evaluating biomarker expression. Co-authors include Anthony McCabe, Marisa Dolled-Filhart, Robert L. Camp, and David L. Rimm. The Results: Results for p53 were similar to those of HER2, and only ER expression was always associated with increased survival, regardless of antibody concentration or expression level. These results suggest that conventional immunohistochemistry did not detect the relationship between antibody concentration/dilution and outcome as detected with the AQUA-based assay, and also suggest that the antibody concentration arbitrarily chosen by the pathologist may not be adequate to cover the expression range of the biomarker of interest. The apparent reversal of the relationship between expression and survival rate occurs when there is a non-linear relationship and when they follow a U-shaped curve. ER was always predicted correctly due to its linear relationship. About Yale Cancer Center About HistoRx, Inc. Note: Yale University’s news release is available at http://www.yale.edu/opa |
|
|
300 George Street New Haven, CT 06511 |
P: 203 498 7500 |
F: 203 498 7501 |
E: info@historx.com
© 2005 HistoRx.com |